Advanced

Michael Dell's Linux choice? Ubuntu

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 8 comments
DesktopLinux.com; By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Mail this story
Print this story

What operating system do the heads of Fortune 500 companies run on their personal laptops? In the case of Michael S. Dell, president and CEO of Dell, it's Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn. Yes, the head of Dell Inc., with a market-capitalization of just south of $56-billion, isn't just saying that Dell will be selling Linux-equipped PCs in the near future -- he's already running Linux at home.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Linux, Ubuntu

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (8)

> Michael Dell is almost certainly the first billionaire to embrace the penguin

Larry Ellison isn't a billionaire?

Interesting publicity stunt, but put a video on YouTube with him endorsing Linux, showing how he actually uses it for his daily activities.
Quoting:Michael Dell is almost certainly the first billionaire to embrace the penguin.


Embrace? Well, how do you know that?

Did he say that himself or we haven't heard?

Is this just hype and sensationalism on SJVN's part similar to what Dell did a while back?

Dell cried wolf too many times to believe them.

Again, I will believe it when I see it.



Every one has to start somewhere.
Shuttle worth is a US billionaire. In English based naming he is just a thousand-millionaire.

In the US 10^9 is Billion, In England (and S.A.) that's just a Thousand Million.
I don't know that SJVN is given to "sensationalism" ... back last year he was saying that while he would like the rumors to be true, he sincerely doubted Oracle would release their own Linux distribution. A couple of weeks later, he had a large helping of crow to eat when Oracle released its "Unbreakable Linux".
> ...he sincerely doubted Oracle would release their own Linux distribution.

Well, he was largely correct, as Oracle didn't release their own distribution. They settled for re-badging Red Hat.
@jdixon,

Mandrake got their start the same way, but I still consider Mandrake a separate distribution. Ditto with CentOS.
> Mandrake got their start the same way...

Mandrake started as Red Hat with KDE, compiled for Pentium level processors. that's not quite the same thing. They are similar to CentOS, I'll grant, but we'll have to wait and see if they offer the same quality.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post