Throwing in the Towel - Linux on the server = yes. Linux on the desktop = not if I don't have to
|
|
|
Comments (3)
A little pessimistic.
"I'm glad to see any part of any major software ported over to Linux."
I'll second that.I'm signed up with Intuit to get their Linux offering for QB.My problem now is building a server that will handle it.I have a file server and two desktops running Open Suse 10.2 for most of the work,but we still have two machines running Win 2K for QB.It would really help things along being able to have a Linux server taking care of everything.
I'll second that.I'm signed up with Intuit to get their Linux offering for QB.My problem now is building a server that will handle it.I have a file server and two desktops running Open Suse 10.2 for most of the work,but we still have two machines running Win 2K for QB.It would really help things along being able to have a Linux server taking care of everything.
VMware
I felt the same way (linux = server, linux != desktop) until I made the switch.
http://blog.thembid.com/index.php/2007/06/22/ubuntu-the-swit...
http://blog.thembid.com/index.php/2007/06/22/ubuntu-the-swit...
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Hey look --
I'm glad to see any part of any major software ported over to Linux.
Frankly, it makes sense to start out with the obvious. Linux is a strong server platform. Server side is a good place to get your feet wet and build your chops.
We can't forget that Linux got its enterprise start doing a log of humble jobs. Heck, many Linux boxes were "stealth" machines running Samba and pretending to be Windows servers because IT budgets weren't matching calls for capacity. Once in, however...