Incoming EPO president reopens software patent debate
|
|
|
Comments (3)
Funny how "we won't have them" which seems like a decision becomes a policy vacuum. It gives the impression that it is only a discussion that is over and done once they are granted and supported.
> It gives the impression that it is only a discussion that is over and done once they are granted and supported.
And now you've worked out how the ever-encroaching state maintains and expands it's power. Government power always seeks to expand, never contract, and debate is only closed once it gets its way. This is one more way of the government expanding its power. The fact that major corporations are the beneficiaries on this occasion is beside the point. There will always be those that benefit and push for any expansion of government power. But this is an old story, told many times, and the outcome seldom changes, and the battle is never truly won.
And now you've worked out how the ever-encroaching state maintains and expands it's power. Government power always seeks to expand, never contract, and debate is only closed once it gets its way. This is one more way of the government expanding its power. The fact that major corporations are the beneficiaries on this occasion is beside the point. There will always be those that benefit and push for any expansion of government power. But this is an old story, told many times, and the outcome seldom changes, and the battle is never truly won.
pw -
Agreed.
Agreed.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
