- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
US court ruling threatens return to dark ages of radio
|
|
|
Comments (2)
jrm -
Yes.
The Court must determine that the decision by the Copyright Royalty Board -- which was upheld on appeal to the "copyright judges" went beyond the discretion of the board to issue, ie, was not within their power under the law.
Good, bad, or indifferent, the decision may well be one that Congress has empowered them to make, which means we need Congressional action, not to call some court names for refusing to step outside it's proper role.
Yes.
The Court must determine that the decision by the Copyright Royalty Board -- which was upheld on appeal to the "copyright judges" went beyond the discretion of the board to issue, ie, was not within their power under the law.
Good, bad, or indifferent, the decision may well be one that Congress has empowered them to make, which means we need Congressional action, not to call some court names for refusing to step outside it's proper role.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
No, it was a ludicrous decision by the Copyright Royalty Board. That doesn't mean it isn't legally binding.
The U.S. Court of Appeals merely ruled that the standards required for a stay were not met. People might disagree with that, but could we at least hear a logical argument for why this was a "ludicrous" decision?