Dumping Open Source for Microsoft Office
Brace yourself for a rare event: The VAR Guy -- an open source fanatic -- is about to eat crow. Last fall, he dumped Microsoft Office for an open source suite. Now, he’s making the leap back into Microsoft’s arms. What went wrong with our resident blogger’s open source experiment? Here’s the scoop. |
|
|
Comments (22)
2 earlier comments in the full thread.
Of course, that's no reason to dump OOo. He could have just installed Outlook and keep OOo for the rest.
Or, have they?
It's clunky, bloaded, slow, prone to crash and eats my mail. Oh wait, it's actually a pretty good Outlook replacement ;-)
The short story: it's hard if you're trying shoehorn other platforms into Redmond-ware. It's fairly easy if you eliminate Exchange and Outlook from your requirements.
OK, Sander...better clarify:
Has anybody slain this dragon without creating a giant ground sloth?
I'm not really too eager to introduce friends, families and potential clients to great stinking piles that just happen to be free. Sort of defeats the purpose.
Although...maybe we should release Evolution for Windows. Sounds like it would fit the culture.
So, email-pesonal calendar integration is not problem, but email-everybody else's calendar at the same time as yours is a problem?
Or do I misunderstand?
I've been talking to some of my smaller clients about Gmail/Google Apps. Everything in a web browser, easy administration, and mobile integration with automatic sync. It will probably work well with larger clients, too, but I'd have to convince my bosses about that one....
And yes, he could go the Gmail route ... Yahoo Mail ... or even Evolution. I don't make heavy use of e-mail clients, but Evolution works well enough for me. I like the way it integrates with the Palm and syncs the handheld's memos, calendar and contacts. I don't have any Exchange requirements ... it's just plain ol' IMAP.
Quoting:I've been talking to some of my smaller clients about Gmail/Google Apps. Everything in a web browser, easy administration, and mobile integration with automatic sync. It will probably work well with larger clients, too, but I'd have to convince my bosses about that one....I'm the IT manager for a small company. Four locations and around 100 seats. Ownership of the data is a huge issue here. We cannot consider hosted email/calendaring because company ownership of the data is a requirement.
Quoting:If you just want email, a personal calendar, PIM integration, and such, Linux has a lot of options.
I'm not clinging to Exchange. We're testing Zarafa at work. All the Exchange crap (like invites) get translated to standard ICS format. Mail is through Courier IMAP and Calendar access through WebDAV. Still, Evolution performs poorly.
Thunderbird + Lightning was okay back when I was on Exchange. Lightning would get the timezone wrong for invites send and stored from Exchange, but it sorta worked. Except for viewing other people's calendars ofcourse. Now that I'm on Zarafa, Lighning won't read the ICS files for invites/meetings.
If you know of a good IMAP client that also does calendaring through WebDAV and which can handle ICS meeting invitations, please do tell!
I have been using g-mail for so long (4+ years) that I can't imagine not being able to get to, and manage my e-mails. I only recently started using T-bird again, just to see if I could get my g-mail imported to it and so far it has done a really good job of reflecting changes I have made using the web interface and being current.
I am just way too used to the web version that I forget to even use T-bird for days.
Yep, you can use Gmail, even at a public WiFi hotspot, and not have anybody snooping through your mail.
It almost makes me want to switch from Yahoo Mail to Gmail ...
Google isn't exactly promoting this feature, nor is it making the secure connection the default. But Yahoo would be wise to add a full secure session to its e-mail offering in the near future.
In contrast, I don't think there's all that much top-secret stuff going on in my own company's e-mail, but the server is unencrypted in both directions, so the IT people aren't exactly doing a bang-up job ...
If I need to send something and have a bit more security, I use my ISP's secure mail servers.
I use Thunderbird in Windows, where it performs reasonably well. When I'm on my laptop, I just use the company's Web-mail interface; I'm just too lazy to open up and configure the mail client ...
Mac stuff who knows, I don't do Mac.
This article seems kind of dopey. It's like going to a store when you want eggs and milk, but they put the cereal up front and the eggs and milk in back, so you leave in a huff complaining how they only have cereal.
Quoting:If you know of a good IMAP client that also does calendaring through WebDAV and which can handle ICS meeting invitations, please do tell!
You might want to try Kontact (Carla uses it, so it can't be bad); and read my book discussion about it:
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/54485/index.html
I still have that book, and you could have it if you wish.
Quoting:I far prefer a local mail client over a web interface.
So do I, but for 'legacy' reasons I use Hotmail (OK, you can stone me now, but I have been using it with the same address since '99, which is since 4 years before I learned about free software!). I thought about switching to GMail, but for some reason when it comes to privacy I rather trust Microsoft than Google (I know, rather neither of them, but I don't have an own server). In the past, there was hotwayd, which worked via WebDAV, but after Microsoft found out, they stopped WebDAV support for Hotmail (unless you pay). Microsoft tries kind of hard to make it impossible to use "POP3-emulation" via the webinterface with Hotmail without paying, but the great people behind "freepopsd" are trying even harder! They made "POP3-emulation" possible with Hotmail, and at this moment, it works (Hotmail webinterface in changed rather often, so results for the past are no guarentee for the future).
Freepopsd downloads my mail from Hotmail (but you can use it with lots of other crappy webmail too), and then presents itself as a POP3 server to Kontact (or another mail client). It's really slow, but it works. The biggest problem indeed is POP3: If I download it on one of my two PC's it is not available on the other one, and since I don't run my own mail server this has really been a pain in the bottom. If I left the messages on 'hotmail', they were downloaded time and time again, so I ended up having everything three times.
I'm glad I don't live at two addresses anymore, that problem is over now. Now should be the right time to start using an own server, so I should find myself a cheap host.
Back on topic now. Basically, from my viewpoint the problem of this 'varguy' is rather simple: Mac OS X suffers from a lack of free quality apps in some areas compared to Linux.
I'm sure hotmail can forward e-mail to your new address.
Webmail is nice for emergency access.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Err well in my opinion the answer is very simple but I'd rather not start another "session".