- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Not Debian
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| ralph Sep 14, 2005 1:24 PM EDT |
Howdy, Buffalo is a nice distribution which I keep on a laptop. I was shocked when I say in the first paragraph that Buffalo was Debian based. I am not against Debian at all. My main computers run Ubuntu, which is Debian based. It is just that Buffalo had alway been so proud to be a lean Slackware based disto. And it turns out they still are. The author made a mistake. It is such a basic mistake that it brings the whole review into question fo me. The author even admitted his error in the discussion atLinux.com, and then said Buffalo still should have used dpkg as its package handler. So, does he criticize Apple for not running DOS programs, or what next. I say try Buffalo, but forget this review. |
| tadelste Sep 15, 2005 10:28 AM EDT |
Severian: It's time to weed out these wannabe reviewers. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post