You'd have to be completely unfirewalled to see damage
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| AnonymousCoward Nov 07, 2005 6:19 PM EST |
The remote control opens on ports 7111 and 7222, and it doesn't do anything local except open a listener on one or the other of those ports (there are (so far) two variants, the only reported difference being that port number). If you (as I do) set your machines up with French Foreign Legion firewalling rules ("you shall do nothing except") then this won't be a problem for you. I'm also seeing a lot of ssh login attempts recently, on those few machines I have which still run sshd on the default port. |
| tuxchick Nov 07, 2005 7:03 PM EST |
It's a pretty punky threat. Poor little feeble thing. |
| AnonymousCoward Nov 08, 2005 2:26 AM EST |
Perhaps we can ask the authors to publish the source, so we can have a real threat for a change? (-: |
| tuxchick Nov 08, 2005 8:07 AM EST |
heh, yes, after all the FOSS ideal "collaborate, improve, share" :) |
| tadelste Nov 08, 2005 8:13 AM EST |
Hey, I quoted you two in an article - actually you made the article since the majority of text is yours. I thought it worked pretty well. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
