- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
This article lacks soul
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| tadelste Jan 14, 2006 7:00 AM EST |
I read the article more than one time and the guy produced a flawed article. He used four pages to say nothing of interest. He provides no empirical data, seems self-serving and generates no eye openers. I thought about writing something to rebute the article, but I cannot find anything worth discussing. As a copy editor, he would not survive the first pass. From strictly a grammatical and functional perspective, one would have to write the article again to make it readable. Then, we have the content to evaluate and the article lacks substance. I still believe we should have posted it. He provides an opportunity for us to comment on sophomoric writing. He also exposes a movement within the community where people attempt to monetize open source software without any means of doing so. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post