Non ugly?
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| Sachankara Jul 12, 2006 12:58 AM EDT |
I must say, I think it looks b*ttugly. A straight copy of the Apple i-whatever media-thingy, and not even a good copy so far. Fortunatly, it was not the developers that claimed it was "the non ugly" media player, because that would just have been rude and stupid. |
| grouch Jul 12, 2006 3:22 AM EDT |
Just curious, since everyone has their own opinion -- what do you consider so ugly about it? All I could see was a lot of screen real estate taken up by black, around an image, along with some things that look like buttons at the bottom. |
| jimf Jul 12, 2006 5:24 AM EDT |
Sounds like the old noncommittal 'interesting' that we artists used when a friends work was crap, but, we wanted to be polite. I must say "Non Ugly" has possibilities. |
| SFN Jul 12, 2006 5:28 AM EDT |
Say "interesting" and do the Spock eyebrow. Now say "non-ugly" and do the Spock eyebrow. I believe that "interesting" is the way to go. |
| jimf Jul 12, 2006 6:39 AM EDT |
You're right SFN... Doesn't work with Spock eyebrows. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
