Microsoft Getting Closer to the Fire
The ethics committee, the House's mechanism for enforcing rules for members, has operated for exactly one day since Congress convened in January. In the meanwhile, a former Preston, Gates and Ellis lobbyist, Jack Abramoff has become the target of several serious investigations and the focus of the D.C. media. Abramoff left Preston Gates in 2000. Even so, he's a problem for the firm's management. Reports have surfaced questioning Abramoff's financing of travel for lawmakers, especially House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas). All of the spending under investigation happened while Abramoff worked at Preston Gates. The Washington Post reported that airfare to London and Scotland in 2000 for House Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) was charged to an American Express card issued to Jack Abramoff. House ethics rules bar lawmakers from accepting travel and related expenses from registered lobbyists. How Does This Affect MicrosoftMany people believe that Microsoft helped construct Preston, Gates & Ellis as an alter ego for the Business Software Alliance. The firm of William H. Gates Sr., father of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, merged with Preston in 1990. The later old line Seattle firm started when Harold Preston located in Seattle from Iowa in 1883 and began practicing law. Jim Ellis joined Preston in 1949. By getting William Gates Sr. together with Preston, Microsoft suddenly had an organization that looked like a law firm and not the legal department of Microsoft. The Seattle firm also had a small office in Washington, D.C. which helped Microsoft and the Business Software Alliance reach out and affect government policy. But, Preston, Gates & Ellis needed to show some lobbying fees and clients other than Microsoft and the BSA. Adding Abramoff did just that. Additionally, he had his own clients and did not have to work on any Microsoft or BSA business. Bad ChoiceAdding Abramoff accomplished the goal of diversifying Preston, Gates & Ellis revenue and client base. But, Jack Abramoff didn't fit the culture. While most lobbyists seem happy with a six figure salary, Jack made millions annually. He also could be considered a maverick. Now, the partners of Preston Gates must deal with the consequences of discovering their firm is listed on the invoice for Tom DeLay's plane fare to Scotland. They may also have to consider how deep and far the probe of their firm may go. For example, both Preston Gates and the Business Software Alliance are listed as contributors to the campaign of Senator Patrick J. Leahy, the Chairman of the Senate Judicial committee that ruled on the Government's settlement with Microsoft. Meanwhile House majority leader Tom DeLay says that expenses on his trip were paid by a nonprofit organization and that the financial arrangements for it were proper. He contends that he had no way of knowing that any lobbyist financially supported the trip, either directly or through reimbursements to the nonprofit organization. Non-profit organizations, foundations, multiple corporate entities seem like the products of a firm like Preston, Gates & Ellis. Someone will want to look into those issues. For example, on June 7, 2005, Bill Gates profile on CampaignMoney.com shows that he's contributed $59,100 since 1999 to all political candidates. Of course, that's personal money. Given the tens of millions of dollars attributed to Microsoft in campaign contributions, it might look like some kind of front organizations have made contributions beneficially for the welfare of the richest man in the world. And the connection between Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff: DeLay helped defeat a bill that would tax Preston Gates clients - American Indian casinos. You have to also wonder if those casinos used Microsoft Office. Stay TunedAs they say around my part of the country, there's no telling what you might see as the days start to pass. For sure, the media won't let the Tom Delay story go. Further, the guy blocking the committee hearings is the representative from the state of Washington. Is that just another coincidence? Perhaps it is. Respectfully submitted |
Comments (19)
moral compass
Regardless of the psychological make-up, I just would like it to stop.
Human motives are complex. One motive for Gates' philantropic activities may well be trying to make up with his conscience... wouldn't be the first time (Rockefeller anyone?)
- Martin
No question that secular thought prevades business. However, some giants were extremely religious. I know of many who went to Mass every morning and not to impress anyone - I'm talking the earliest morning Mass.
Such intelligent commentary! Y'know, ya could try being dumb every now and then, just to let the rest of us feel better.
As to greed, there really are truly avaricious and greedy people. Mostly, I think we tend to let envy creep in and apply the word to anybody who has much more than we do. BG fits that description more than anybody else, so he must be the greediest SOB in the world, right?
Quoting:Y'know, ya could try being dumb every now and then, just to let the rest of us feel better.
I knew there was a reason why I felt better after reading your commentary, Dino.
:0)
Quoting:dinotrac: I feel taller too...
Well, then, I have done some good.
Actually his philantropic ventures -- a form of entrepreneurship itself -- can well be seen as a way of trading one currency of success for another. You can see that with many millionaires: Larry Ellison sailing for the America Cup or what, Mark Shuttleworth going into orbit... none of them quietly retire with their money. Success always tastes of more, and the hunger doesn't go away by eating ;-)
(Many economists completely miss this picture BTW).
If we open-sourcers can identify one motivation of open-source development in terms of the currency of personal reputation instead of money, shouldn't we then be able to understand somewhat similar motives in others?
- Martin
Yes.
It is, however, human nature to create "us and them" divisions that convert our differences into funamental moral divisions.
"We" are the good guys, moral and just. "They" are the avaricious beasts, not to be left alone with your children.
T'ain't right, and t'ain't useful.
Sigh. Whatever happend to "There, but for the grace of God, go I"?
Quoting:Sigh. Whatever happend to "There, but for the grace of God, go I"?
It's easier to go to war than to diplomatically find a solution. Society, however, is composed of people that for the most part, chose the latter over the former, and we can only hope that this mentality prevails long-term. We can continually identify Microsoft as an enemy (and in some respects, they've fingered us as such, so it works somewhat), but until the swords drop and the common ground is found, there's going to be ugly pigeon-holing -- that's how one defines an enemy in mass, after all.
Speaking of which,
You self-righeous judgemental hackers are all alike.
You crouch in the dust of your make-shift confessionals, nothing but the smell of burning insense and the glow of your religious-software-laden-laptops to guide your way. You pop onto LXer's message board with smarmy sayings like the above, all the while thinking "Oh, but I'm not like them!" NO! But we see how you are.
One day soon some other maroon (rhymes!) will come along and judge you like you've been judging the masses. The creep will probably act like he's not the same way you are, and then (THEN!) you'll understand the error of your ways! Then we'll see how smarmy you feel.
Wait, that just happened. I guess you don't have to wait, after all.
Crap. --FeriCyde
Give peace a chance? Deny the evil of human nature - not that evil is omnipotent, but certainly the mass murders of history should give you a clue that it exists.
Now, a good example of having to take a stand is a movie called "Do the right thing" - Spike Lee. In the beginning of that movie you see a picture of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King. MLK has his arm over the shoulder of Malcolm X.
The movie progresses from there until finally someone takes a stand.
Taking a stand is quite a remarkable and totally unreasonable thing to do. Because if you dabble with reason, you can't take a stand. Of course you can take a stand to dabble with reason but it won't forward the action.
Now, I have to go speak later this month in a country where MS dominates and I'm the keynote. Do I dance around the issue or do I say the truth?
If I thought that MS was benign at all and in any way, I would stand up and try to make people like me. But I have pictures and tapes in my head of mass murder and people laying on battlefields. I also have some pictures of people who gave their lives for freedom -- more than once.
So, do I do the right thing and say what's so?
That's an interesting question and I won't know until I get there and mingle with the people. You see, people have to be in a condition for communication or they will reject everything. If the condition for communication exists, I'll ask them what they want to hear.
Does that mean I have forgotten the fact that I believe evil exists? Hey, as the people walked to the ovens and their death, many survivors say they didn't believe it. They were in denial. And I'm talking about Catholics. Because the haulocaust is not an exclusive event to one people. The people of my faith suffered like those who seem to be the main victims.
In a world that works for everyone, monopolists live in Anartica.
What I'm driving at is that there are times when you have to make moral judgements, and make descisions that as a whole are going to suck. Someone is going to go down and your revelation of truth is the sole divider.
To really do this, you must come to some conclusions -- sometimes for the greater good, someone is going to suffer, because what they're doing is harmful. Thier intentions are not always good, in other words. Peace works well but requires the enforcement, vigilance and belief in human evil -- stuff that not everyone sees.
I'm sure that Dino was being sarcastic anyway. Good thing I'm not like that *phwew*. --FeriCyde
Actually, I was just responding to Paul's rather cowardly sneak attack on my prodigious character.
Getting along with Microsoft is something we have to do to the extent that our clients and customers use it.
Grumble, grumble, grumble. Damned Internet Explorer. How do Windows users live with that POS?
Their slot machine run Windows
Quoting:You have to also wonder if those casinos used Microsoft OfficeTom, you are probably dead on with this one.
I have traveled up I-35 to the Winstar Casino just across the Oklahoma border on an Indian reserve a couple time in the last month. The last time I was there, one of the slot machines next to me crashed. As they rebooted the crashed machine, I was horrified to see a Windows 2000 boot screen.
Needless to say I cashed out and will never return to that Casino again. It's all my fault really. I should have been suspicious with a name like WINstar. Looks like I'm down $500 to MS even though I never by their alleged software.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
|
|
-------------------------- Steve Stites