Advanced

Comment of the Day - January 12, 2006 - Refreshing View on Piracy

Posted by tadelste on Jan 14, 2006 7:17 PM · 3 comments
LXer.com -Forum Post; By Teron

Teron writes: I recently rented the film Aliens vs. Predator.
Haven't watched it yet, don't know if it's cr*p or not.
But, when I put the DVD to my PS2 to watch it, up jumps a commercial.
It was that commercial that made me write this.

"You wouldn't steal this, you wouldn't steal that. You wouldn't steal a movie, right? Movie piracy is stealing. Stealing is against the law. Piracy is a crime."

Now, let's move to a broader scale than just movies. Let's expand to music and computer software. Both have the same basic setup as the movie business.

So, on the other side of the fence are the thieves, who deprive an industry of the profits it deserves. So, what's on the other side?



An industry that gives jacksh*t of it's customers and wants to deprive them of freedom (Trusted Platform Modules, DRM, and gods alone know what else).
An industry that cares little for anything that's not called "money".
Hell, they even break the law to ensure that their products couldn't possibly be used accordingly to the "Fair Use" clauses in most copyright laws. Prime example being the Sony BMG XCP-DRM scandal.

Now, I don't want to steal. Nor do I want to break the law.
But, even more important than that, I don't want to give up my freedom. So, what's the solution? DRM? Trusted Platform Modules? No chance in hell. Piratism? No, unless someone finds a way to turn my morals upside down.

Point is, a "do-not-circumvent-copy-protection" law was recently passed here in Finland, which'd essentially make creating a personal backup, for example, illegal. I'm already frustrated as hell because a CD record of a band's live performance is copy controlled. Sure, I can somewhat circumvent the DRM by using dBpowerAMP Music Converter and telling it to read TOCs like a normal CD player, but I still lose the first two songs on both discs. Hello, Virgin, I BOUGHT THIS THING TO LISTEN TO IT. THERE'S NO EULA, SO I TECHNICALLY OWN THE DAMN THING.

Now, Why can't I do what I want with my property?



Should I carry a CD player with me just to play that specific disc, when, in all sensibility, and by the letter of the Finnish law (before that idiotic law was passed), I should be allowed to make a couple electronic copies (iPod+own computer) for my own, personal use? I don't think so.

So, my options are to either side with the criminals, or to side with the other criminals. Where's the third side of the fence, where things make sense? In the movie world, nowhere. In the music world, there's some, but in rare places. In the software world? the F/OSS movements seem to be filling the spot.

Thank you for creating a third side of the fence - even if it only stretches for a part of the way.

Return to the LXer Features

Comments (3)

Boycott

These stupid you-must-not-circumvent-copy-protection laws have been established in many countried over the last couple of years. Often enough, they leave the consumer in a dilemma similiar as you described. There is a single but brutal way out of the dilemma, you can boycott.

I simply don't buy Music CDs that have so-called copy protection on them. Why should I buy CSS-encrypted DVDs if I am not legally allowed to play them on my GNU/Linux machine, then? Remember, nobody can force you to buy that non-free piece of software that's so vital for you. Unfortunately, most people don't care and either just swallow the bitter pill or make illegal copies anyway. Otherwise, a boycott could possibly be effective.
Not enough people yet. A few more DRM faux pas, and people will start to realise that "hey, these scumbags are treating us like an enemy, not a customer!"

"The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin..."

That's the real absurdity here. It's not the people who copy and then sell movies, thus "depriving the studios of their justly deserved profits", that are being punished. Doing that has always been illegal.

These new laws are just making more and more "incidental" criminals. Ayn Rand pointed out that the State has no power to punish people who have committed no crimes, so it's in the State's favor to make as many people into criminals as possible.

Hmm....

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post

LXer

  Latest Features
bob: LXer now speaks Markdown
Oct 27, 2026

bob: How to protect against PHP2Shell
Oct 26, 2026

Scott Ruecker (San Diego, U.S.): Linux That's Small
Oct 14, 2024

penguinist: Encryption, Trust, and the Hidden Dangers of Vendor-Controlled Data
Aug 27, 2024

Scott Ruecker (San Diego, U.S.): My Linux Mint Tribute
Aug 23, 2024

Scott Ruecker (San Diego, U.S.): How I Turned My Chromebook Into A "Mintbook"
Jul 08, 2024

Scott Ruecker (San Diego, U.S.): Adventures With My New Chromebook
Jun 10, 2024

Scott Ruecker: My Linux Laptop
May 08, 2022

Scott Ruecker: Laptop Dual Boot Project: Part 2
Nov 30, 2021

Scott Ruecker: Laptop Dual Boot Project
Nov 30, 2020


View all

  Search Features

Search LXer Features:

[ Copyright © LXer | All times are recorded in Central Daylight Time (CDT) ]

[ Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | About us | rss | Mobile ]

Login