Advanced

Greens urge end to software patents

Posted by Sander_Marechal on · 7 comments
Stuff.co.nz; By Claire McEntee
Mail this story
Print this story

The Green Party has called for an overhaul of patent laws that would prevent software being patented. The party's policy on information technology was released by MP Metiria Turei. Ms Turei, who called for greater use of open source and locally developed software, says excluding software from patents would ensure others could develop ideas. Software would still be protected against piracy by copyright law.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Community

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (7)

Sounds like a great plan from the greens, but how are they doing in the polls? Are they a major party? Small? Fringe?
American greens are a small party.

I had the pleasure of marching in a local 4th of July party in support of my friend, who is running for a local county office as the Green Party candidate, but...

the party itself is, ummm, not entirely sensible.

Big gaffe:Cynthia McKinney as Presidential candidate.

Most notable achievement: hitting a capitol police officer for doing his job when he stopped here and asked for identification.

Sigh.
I knew that about the American greens. Realistically the US has only two parties (plus a number of fringe parties). But how about New Zealand? Do the greens have any change of winning and thus be the first country to actively say no to software patents?
The Greens are part of the labor lead coalition in NZ. In Australia they tend to hold the balance of Power in the Senate, and have never been elected into the Lower house.
Okay, so they are big enough to be the deciding vote on proposals but not big enough to push through new proposals?
dinotrac correctly stated:

"the party itself is, ummm, not entirely sensible"

This is true, unfortunately, in the United States and in my state of California. Not because of Cynthia McKinney, though. In a nutshell, Greens in the U.S. would rather fiddle with debate and "parliamentary procedure and process" while the country and world burn.

[This comes from yours truly, the former Liaison to the Secretary of State for the Green Party of California (the equivalent of the state party chair) and the Green Party's Insurance Commissioner candidate in California in 2006.]

Frankly, I got tired of the infighting and I am no longer registered Green. But I can say that what is "sensible" about the Green Party in the U.S. is that they've always been ahead of the curve on FOSS, and they've always had a fairly strong platform plank on its implementation dating back to the '96 Nader campaign.

Meanwhile, it's good to see other Green parties that have some legislative stature in their governments taking up FOSS where it counts. Go, New Zealand Greens.
lcafiero -

I thought it was a good sign that my friend was running for a local office, and yet...

couldn't help wondering why, in 2008, nobody else in the area had.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post