Quick Look: Ubuntu Muslim Edition 10.10 (Sabily Al Quds)
A while back, I did a full review of Ubuntu Muslim Edition 10.04 on Desktop Linux Reviews. This time around I’ll be covering the 10.10 version of that distro. The official name of this distro is simply “Sabily,” and this particular release is dubbed “Al Quds.” However, I have simply renamed it “Ubuntu Muslim Edition 10.10? for this quick look, to make it easier for folks to know exactly what it is. |
|
|
Comments (35)
15 earlier comments in the full thread.
Believe it or not I reject many many Ubuntu related articles (then again I reject a lot of articles period) because as the person who willingly sifts through the din of articles that are submitted to us and all the articles that come in through our webcrawler as well as my own collection of RSS feeds even I get tired of hearing about Ubuntu.
Crazy I know, but true. Just because someone writes an article about Ubuntu it doesn't mean that it makes our newswire. That said, Ubuntu is the Juggernaut of Linux distros right now. I know that no one will believe me, but it will not stay that way forever and a day will come that another version will come of age and superseed Ubuntu even. Even more craziness, I know. But I can say with confidence that I have been doing this long enough to know that it will happen, eventually..
Scott
Being an Ubuntu user the number of articles about how to do things I haven't done yet are good for me. I must admit though that I can see the day approaching when I will have to switch to something else, even if it doesn't work as well for me. Unity is one reason. I have a sub-notebook on which I run Ubuntu 10.04 UNR because I like working with the programs full screen (I'm well over 50 and the 1280x800 12" screen isn't the best for my eyes). I tried 10.10 on it and got Unity. They can keep it.
I may feel the same way about Wayland. So, I keep trying other distributions and maybe some day one will fit my way of doing things better than Ubuntu.
I have one Ubuntu 10.04 laptop, another with Debian Lenny (with my "main" laptop running Fedora 13). While the installation of Debian isn't forbiddingly difficult, Ubuntu's is way more friendly/foolproof. Fedora is doing a better and better job of marketing itself, but it's still nowhere near as newbie-friendly and -focused as Ubuntu.
As a writer/typist looking for traffic, sure I've run Ubuntu in the past with part of the reason being that blog entries about Ubuntu get more traffic than entries about any other distribution.
I can tell you that writing about Debian doesn't bring as much traffic. I made a conscious choice to give Fedora a long-term tryout. I suspect that more people use Fedora than you might think, but it's still dwarfed by the onslaught of Ubuntu.
Just wanted to clue you in - when the facts are not in your favor, be inventive (or innovate) or just plain make it up.
;YBT
That and that alone is the one reason I'm willing to recommend Ubuntu to Linux newbies. Being able to go to a forum and ask newbie questions without being insulted for being a newbie is a very valuable thing.
Quoting:Speaking as a BSD user (mostly Open-, some Free-), unless you do your homework (and even if you do), they'll eat you alive.Oh yeah - I ran FreeBSD in the 1990s. After that experience, the lkml seemed mild mannered.
They're actively looking for contributors, encouraging users to get involved, and generally the Fedora Forums http://forums.fedoraforum.org/ are very helpful.
It sets the tone for the project. If you say "Friends," you pretty much say you're not going to flame somebody for being a newbie and not yet memorizing the man pages.
Sure Fedora has extremely close ties to Red Hat. For some that's a plus, for others not so much. But I think it's pretty clear what's going on vis a vis the profit-seeking Red Hat and the community project that has a lot of Red Hat contributors but is promoting Freedom as one of its four F's.
The Canonical/Ubuntu connection is different. I'm not saying better or worse, just different. There's no SABDFL in Fedora. (Of course OpenBSD does have such a SABDFL, and he's not all that benevolent either. He puts together a great OS, though ...)
Different strokes ...
I fail.
So when does Angelina Jolie come out with a Linux distro?
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

We encourage you to submit non-Ubuntu related stories here: http://lxer.com/module/newswire/stories/stories
If they're about open standards, open source, free software and / or Linux, not too much about politics, I'm pretty sure they will make it to the front page.
Articles will make it to the frontpage even if editors don't agree, think the article is worthless, full of spelling errors or other perceived problems. We don't want to dictate what visitors should read, that's their own choice. We only look at the criteria.
Most Ubuntu-articles meet the criteria above, hence you will see lots of them on the front page. Again, we encourage any reader to post interesting articles meeting the criteria to LXer; it makes life of the editors (>95% our EiC Scott Ruecker) so much easier!