Advanced

Pushing Reiser4 Is "Not Of High Priority"

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 6 comments
Phoronix; By Michael Larabel
Mail this story
Print this story

Edward Shishkin, the lone developer that took over development of the Reiser4 file-system following the conviction of Hans Reiser, has shared a new update with Phoronix regarding the efforts towards pushing Reiser4 into the mainline Linux kernel. Reiser4 has been in development going back to 2004 and had a promising future until the conviction of Hans Reiser and demise of his Namesys company following the murder of Reiser's wife, but since then it's development has been stagnate. In late 2009 I was told by Edward Shishkin that Reiser4 may go for mainline inclusion in 2010. Before pushing again for mainline integration he wanted to publish an article in a scholarly magazine regarding Reiser4's design in order to facilitate some independent expert review.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Kernel, Linux

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

"Reiser4 has been in development going back to 2004 and had a promising future until the conviction of Hans Reiser and demise of his Namesys company following the murder of Reiser's wife,"

is inaccurate, and should read:

"Reiser4 has been in development going back to 2004 and had a promising future until the conviction of Hans Reiser and demise of his Namesys company following Reiser's murder of his wife Nina,"

or similar. The previous implies that Nina was murdered by some anonymous person, and Reiser happened to be convicted for it, and is disingenuous. Reiser himself murdered his wife, and this should not be glossed over. Moreover, if his filesystem gets any more use, it should be renamed "NinaFS" in her honor, as he doesn't deserve his name living on after his actions.
Your right it does read like that, wondering if that was deliberate or accidental?

Quoting:Your right it does read like that, wondering if that was deliberate or accidental?


Probably a syntax error, similar to yours.

Quoting:Your right


should read "you're right", what you wrote means something quite different, referring to that side of you where your right hand is located.
Quoting:Probably a syntax error, similar to yours.


Good point TA and thank you for pointing it out.

I personally don't like all the short form syntax, NOT the people who use them mind you, and hate it when they have totally different meaning. I have enough trouble understanding good English. :-)

As a Brit. reading newspaper headlines over here in Canada (where I am at the moment) I do find them very confusing.

They have a strange kind of compressed syntax which can make the meaning very ambiguous:

Examples:

"Man killed prostitute: Police", what does this mean exactly? Is it a statement by the police, is the suspect a policeman or was the prostitute an undercover cop?

"Army, Navy carry out exercises", common to see "," substituted for "and" or "&" but sometimes I have to read the headline a number of times to suss out exactly what they mean.

Oh britian why you no speak english so well. ;)

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post