- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Who Makes the Decisions on School Software? We Need to Know
|
|
|
Comments (27)
7 earlier comments in the full thread.
Quoting:Anything run by the government becomes a heavily politicized environment.
I am not in favor of big government, but it is also fair to mention that anything run by private sector leads to ignoring any national interest and concentrate on making money.
Supply and demand doesn't work any more due to absolute necessity of some services & products that leads to the formations of curtals.
> ...but it is also fair to mention that anything run by private sector leads to ignoring any national interest and concentrate on making money.
Government run and private business run aren't the only options out there. Education, in the end, is the responsibility of the parents. If they're not capable of handling it themselves, they need to find someone who can. The government shouldn't be their only option.
Government run and private business run aren't the only options out there. Education, in the end, is the responsibility of the parents. If they're not capable of handling it themselves, they need to find someone who can. The government shouldn't be their only option.
> I am not in favor of big government, but it is also fair to mention that anything run by private sector leads to ignoring any national interest and concentrate on making money.
Which is only true in a monopoly situation. Not one of competition.
> that leads to the formations of curtals.
Cartels are another hobgoblin, created to frighten people into giving up their liberty. For all the incentives that lead someone to join a cartel, also lead to breaking the cartel.
If you're interested, please see chapter 10 of Man, Economy, and State, by Murray Rothbard. Online gratis, http://mises.org/rothbard/mes.asp
> ignoring any national interest
Non-sequitur. Education is about learning, a personal journey by the student. There is no "national interest" in education.
Horace Mann addressed the "national interest" in his writings on SCHOOLING, which I recommend to anyone interested in the subject.
Education and schooling have little or nothing to do with each other.
Which is only true in a monopoly situation. Not one of competition.
> that leads to the formations of curtals.
Cartels are another hobgoblin, created to frighten people into giving up their liberty. For all the incentives that lead someone to join a cartel, also lead to breaking the cartel.
If you're interested, please see chapter 10 of Man, Economy, and State, by Murray Rothbard. Online gratis, http://mises.org/rothbard/mes.asp
> ignoring any national interest
Non-sequitur. Education is about learning, a personal journey by the student. There is no "national interest" in education.
Horace Mann addressed the "national interest" in his writings on SCHOOLING, which I recommend to anyone interested in the subject.
Education and schooling have little or nothing to do with each other.
Quoting:> To be fair, teachers work in a rather heavily "politicized" environment
Which is one of the reasons I say education is too important to be left in the hands of the government. Anything run by the government becomes a heavily politicized environment.
Obviously spoken by someone who has never been to a private school.
> Obviously spoken by someone who has never been to a private school.
Do you have any idea how closely private schools are controlled by the government?
They're effectively private government contractors.
Do you have any idea how closely private schools are controlled by the government?
They're effectively private government contractors.
> They're effectively private government contractors.
This problem is exacerbated anywhere that "vouchers" have been implemented, with predictable results.
The private schools continue to exceed the public in every academic measure. Likely because they are not wholely restricted to the "national interest".
One private school I had truck with was, sadly, entirely wedded to Windows, but used OpenOffice for fiscal reasons.
This problem is exacerbated anywhere that "vouchers" have been implemented, with predictable results.
The private schools continue to exceed the public in every academic measure. Likely because they are not wholely restricted to the "national interest".
One private school I had truck with was, sadly, entirely wedded to Windows, but used OpenOffice for fiscal reasons.
Quoting:The private schools continue to exceed the public in every academic measure. Likely because they are not wholely restricted to the "national interest".
Another favorite canard supported only by carefully selected samples.
> Another favorite canard supported only by carefully selected samples.
Do you have a source for appropriate samples? I'd be interested in seeing them.
The statistics I've seen back up the statement, but I'm willing to consider evidence that they may be wrong.
And a quick Google search followed by attempts to eliminate obviously biased sources (CAPE and education.com, for instance) gave a 2 to 1 advantage to articles saying private schools outperformed public ones. Even the one who argued otherwise had to claim socioeconomic factors were responsible for the difference.
Do you have a source for appropriate samples? I'd be interested in seeing them.
The statistics I've seen back up the statement, but I'm willing to consider evidence that they may be wrong.
And a quick Google search followed by attempts to eliminate obviously biased sources (CAPE and education.com, for instance) gave a 2 to 1 advantage to articles saying private schools outperformed public ones. Even the one who argued otherwise had to claim socioeconomic factors were responsible for the difference.
Part of my point was that the school/classroom tends to be a highly politicized environment, even aside from any government involvement. Public schools, private schools -- makes little difference. Getting away from the government bureaucracy merely swaps some of the politics for another kind of "more of the same".
(heck, even with home schooling)
(heck, even with home schooling)
I support jdixon's contention here in Queensland. The top marks in the state for assessment last year in the examinations leading to university were taken by a very prestigious and private Brisbane grammar school run exclusively for boys. Those results have just been released this week in the daily press.
BernardSwiss, I am not sure you actually can politicise those classrooms at that private grammar school. Certainly they must teach the state approved curriculum contents, but how they teach them is up to the school, and the curriculum is essentially educational content and apolitical. My tentative feelings are that the parents would be outraged if politics of any sort entered the private school classroom - it just would not be acceptable under any circumstances. My other perceptions are that private school teachers tend to hold themselves a little more aloof from the squabbles that pervade the spaces of the public school teachers. Again, this is only how I see it here in Queensland.
BernardSwiss, I am not sure you actually can politicise those classrooms at that private grammar school. Certainly they must teach the state approved curriculum contents, but how they teach them is up to the school, and the curriculum is essentially educational content and apolitical. My tentative feelings are that the parents would be outraged if politics of any sort entered the private school classroom - it just would not be acceptable under any circumstances. My other perceptions are that private school teachers tend to hold themselves a little more aloof from the squabbles that pervade the spaces of the public school teachers. Again, this is only how I see it here in Queensland.
> Getting away from the government bureaucracy merely swaps some of the politics for another kind of "more of the same".
To a degree, that's true of any organized human activity. Groups of people find it hard to operate without a structure, and that structure inevitably includes politics.
However, I would argue that both governmental politics and its one size fits all approach to things tend to be very disruptive of an activity such as learning, which by it's very nature is extremely individualized. Far more so than the bureaucratic structures of businesses and small organizations. Especially when such politics and approaches originate from the highest levels of government rather than local ones. Simply put, in education, one size fits all does not work; and yet that's what government involvement inevitably gives you.
To a degree, that's true of any organized human activity. Groups of people find it hard to operate without a structure, and that structure inevitably includes politics.
However, I would argue that both governmental politics and its one size fits all approach to things tend to be very disruptive of an activity such as learning, which by it's very nature is extremely individualized. Far more so than the bureaucratic structures of businesses and small organizations. Especially when such politics and approaches originate from the highest levels of government rather than local ones. Simply put, in education, one size fits all does not work; and yet that's what government involvement inevitably gives you.
Very well said in the last line jdixon.......and that, unfortunately, is what is being forced (if it can) by the present Australian Federal Parliament. Diversity of educational curricula (with our states all "doing their own thing") produces innovation, lateral thinking, progess; regimentation, to my mind, produces the opposite effects.
Hmmm, I wonder how come other countries where education from baby sitting to higher education are doing so well even though they are administered by government? Ex. Most of Europe, far east, and even in the Middle East.
The US has been importing their engineers and professionals and for a long time.
Edited: I believe there are many factors other than government control that influence education.
The US has been importing their engineers and professionals and for a long time.
Edited: I believe there are many factors other than government control that influence education.
> I wonder how come other countries where education from baby sitting to higher education are doing so well even though they are administered by government?
Most governments don't try to educate the entire population. If you start with a preselected set, you usually achieve better results. You also achieve better results if you have a relatively homogenous population.
> The US has been importing their engineers and professionals and for a long time.
There are other factors at work in that besides education.
> I believe there are many factors other than government control that influence education.
Yes. But centralized government control almost uniformly makes it worse. This is true even when it's at the state level. It's much worse when it's at the federal level.
Most governments don't try to educate the entire population. If you start with a preselected set, you usually achieve better results. You also achieve better results if you have a relatively homogenous population.
> The US has been importing their engineers and professionals and for a long time.
There are other factors at work in that besides education.
> I believe there are many factors other than government control that influence education.
Yes. But centralized government control almost uniformly makes it worse. This is true even when it's at the state level. It's much worse when it's at the federal level.
Quoting:Most governments don't try to educate the entire population.
True, but the selection process is a very natural one. It is based on "Survival of the fittest" not for those who has the money to afford it. Government supports those that are fit to accomplish. I don't see any problem with that.
Quoting:You also achieve better results if you have a relatively homogenous population.
I don't agree with that. Is there evidence?
Quoting:But centralized government control almost uniformly makes it worse.
I agree with that and it is why I prefer local administration of schools.
Quoting:This is true even when it's at the state level.
Local governments are elected by us and consequently people have power over them. If they are not doing their jobs, they shouldn't be elected again.
Like you said, it all boils down to the parents. Not necessary to educate their children, but take interest and make right decisions.
"Like you said, it all boils down to the parents. Not necessary to educate their children, but take interest and make right decisions."
I would add: to help educate their children. Otherwise, that really says it.
I would add: to help educate their children. Otherwise, that really says it.
> True, but the selection process is a very natural one
The selection process is immaterial. We don't do it. We try to educate everyone. We may not succeed, but we try. Thus, comparisons to most other countries are apples to oranges.
> I don't agree with that. Is there evidence?
The very studies which rate homogenous population countries above the US in the rankings. It should be obvious that one size fits all works a lot better when you're dealing with a group which has a lot in common.
> Local governments are elected by us and consequently people have power over them.
Most people don't consider state level governments to be "local", except in comparison to the federal government. :)
I agree that if you must have public schools, it's best to run them at the county, city, and town level.
> Like you said, it all boils down to the parents.
I'm glad we can agree on that point.
The selection process is immaterial. We don't do it. We try to educate everyone. We may not succeed, but we try. Thus, comparisons to most other countries are apples to oranges.
> I don't agree with that. Is there evidence?
The very studies which rate homogenous population countries above the US in the rankings. It should be obvious that one size fits all works a lot better when you're dealing with a group which has a lot in common.
> Local governments are elected by us and consequently people have power over them.
Most people don't consider state level governments to be "local", except in comparison to the federal government. :)
I agree that if you must have public schools, it's best to run them at the county, city, and town level.
> Like you said, it all boils down to the parents.
I'm glad we can agree on that point.
> Most people don't consider state level governments to be "local", except in comparison to the federal government.
It's also often beyond the ability of a European to grasp that most of the individual states in the United States are larger than any country in Europe.
> Like you said, it all boils down to the parents.
Regardless of school, that is true.
Back in the 1970s and 80s, there was an influx of Asian immigration to the US. They became parents, and drove their now American children to be educated.
This lead to a phenomenon where the Asian kids were "ruining the curve", in that their performance was so much better that what used to qualify as an "A" grade now wasn't worth a "B". There was a LOT of resentment.
The parents were, effectively, home-schooling their kids and getting the same kind of excellent results.
Not to worry, the institutional lethargy took over in the following generations, just as it did with all the other immigrant influxes into the great Melting Pot, and educational standards for second generation kids in the public schools dropped back to normal.
Public school bureaucracies do not like parental involvement beyond their PTA committee levels. It interferes with the indoctrination.
It's also often beyond the ability of a European to grasp that most of the individual states in the United States are larger than any country in Europe.
> Like you said, it all boils down to the parents.
Regardless of school, that is true.
Back in the 1970s and 80s, there was an influx of Asian immigration to the US. They became parents, and drove their now American children to be educated.
This lead to a phenomenon where the Asian kids were "ruining the curve", in that their performance was so much better that what used to qualify as an "A" grade now wasn't worth a "B". There was a LOT of resentment.
The parents were, effectively, home-schooling their kids and getting the same kind of excellent results.
Not to worry, the institutional lethargy took over in the following generations, just as it did with all the other immigrant influxes into the great Melting Pot, and educational standards for second generation kids in the public schools dropped back to normal.
Public school bureaucracies do not like parental involvement beyond their PTA committee levels. It interferes with the indoctrination.
Quoting:Public school bureaucracies do not like parental involvement beyond their PTA committee levels. It interferes with the indoctrination.
On this point I cannot disagree. However, I would add that the same is not true of the teachers.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
Which is one of the reasons I say education is too important to be left in the hands of the government. Anything run by the government becomes a heavily politicized environment.