Advanced

Hackers Fool Tesla S's Autopilot to Hide and Spoof Obstacles

Posted by bob on · 5 comments
Wired; By Andy Greenberg
Mail this story
Print this story

In May, when a Tesla S in autopilot mode failed to detect a white tractor-trailer turning into its path and careened into the rig's side at 74 miles per hour, killing the car's driver, the question of the reliability of autonomous vehicles came into focus like never before. But for security researchers, that incident raised another, even more menacing issue:

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story, Security; Groups: Community

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (5)

I'm all for stringently hammering these technologies to make sure that they're bulletproof, but what they are proposing with their hacks is equivalent to putting up a fake car on the road to make a real driver swerve or blinding a real driver with lasers.

I thought the article was going to talk about hacking into the electronics remotely.

In all fairness to Tesla, I think that there is a limit to what they can do to prevent malicious physical damage to a car's sensors by a determined road-side attacker.
>In all fairness to Tesla, I think that there is a limit to what they can do to prevent malicious physical damage to a car's sensors by a determined road-side attacker.

It's not physical damage or blinding a real driver with lasers... it's signal jamming of the sensor package.

The 'Wired' article is a little misleading. The costs of the radar jamming hack are greatly exaggerated. The project, as described, is a research project not a production project. The $90,000 arbitrary signal generator is not necessary and could easily be substituted for the $40 low end components used for the ultrasonic tests. Researchers will typically use an expensive arbitrary generator because it's research and many different kinds of signals are required to test things out. However, once the signal waveforms have been designed and captured, very cheap baseband components can be used to create a production unit.

In any case, if an autonomous vehicle doesn't respond to jamming by shutting down the autonomous driving mode... that's a really big problem.

"You can trust our autopilot," they said.

"It's perfectly safe," they said.
Actually, as I recall Tesla said you need to keep both hands on the wheel and pay attention even when using autopilot. Of course, that makes it totally pointless as far as I can tell, but I think that was their official safety advice.
> Actually, as I recall Tesla said you need to keep both hands on the wheel and pay attention even when using autopilot. Of course, that makes it totally pointless as far as I can tell, but I think that was their official safety advice.

Which pretty much makes it a very expensive, yet useless feature - as you said. But I'm sure the sales people can make it sound wonderful and safe still.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post