Advanced

It's Not About Linux, It's the Desktops, Stupid!

Posted by VISITOR on · 3 comments
Linux Today; By Zeek Greko
Mail this story
Print this story

"To most non-technical users, the desktop they see and use is, in totality, what they understand the Operating System to be..."

It's Not About Linux, It's the Desktops, Stupid!

By Zeek Greko

Former US President Bill Clinton's election campaign office (dubbed "the war room") had a sign on the wall that simply stated "It's The Economy! STUPID!!" Put there to remind workers that despite the myriad of other social and political issues needing their attention, they should keep their primary focus on the issue they had determined was of most concern to the voting public. The Economy.

The Linux pundits' ever-present "Is Linux Ready For The Desktop" articles, and their recent rash of "The Honeymoon Is Over For Linux Adoption" articles, refer to a waning interest among the general computer-using public toward moving to Linux kernel-based systems. Some valid peripheral issues are raised in these articles but they are in fact peripheral. They miss the point. The underlying core issue is the desktop. The Desktop Is The Operating System, Isn't It?

To most non-technical users, the desktop they see and use is, in totality, what they understand the Operating System to be.

If they are using KDE, KDE is Linux to them. If it's GNOME they're using, then GNOME is what Linux is to them. They don't care, nor is it absolutely essential that they know more than that. That nearly all endeavors that make use of the Linux OS kernel are referred to as "Linux" is an aberration. The sheer broadness of the term "Linux" is also a source of end-user confusion. Normally, to an end user, the underlying OS kernel is never mentioned when making reference to or describing their system, if it is even known to them at all.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Kernel, KDE, GNOME; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (3)

It is "stupid" to say it is the desktop, it is the applications "stupid".

People use applications not computers and not desktops. If the computer doesn't have the applications that users needs, they will not need the computer. What good is it for any way?

In the enterprise, Thin clients and browser based applications are becoming more and more popular; That is making desktops much less important and eventually will disapprear, although not totaly. Again, it is the applications not the desktops.
Abe -

This may be little more than a semantic quibble.

In Unix land, we understand the desktop as an entity distinct from the OS and from the applications. A non-technical user is unlikely to care about such distinctions, considering desktop to be those things he or she touches to get things done.

In that sense, it really is about the desktop, regardless of the particular piece of technology being touched.
dinotrac - agreed the user could (probably) care less about the distinction, however, most users know the internet is different. Hence, it is the tool they are using that has their attention, a.k.a. the apps.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post