Advanced

Linux News says Netscape's Browser Regaining Market Share

Posted by tadelste on · 11 comments
Lxer Day Desk; By Tom Adelstein, Editor-in-Chief
Mail this story
Print this story

LXer Day Desk: 12-09-2005

So, everyone one forgot that Mozilla got its code from Netscape. A Press Release back in January 1998 said, "The company plans to post the source code beginning with the first Netscape Communicator 5.0 developer release, expected by the end of the first quarter of 1998. This aggressive move will enable Netscape to harness the creative power of thousands of programmers on the Internet by incorporating their best enhancements into future versions of Netscape's software".

So, maybe those folks who say the code endures while companies come and go - have a point. Whatever, Netscape's browser is back.

That press release went on to say:

"The time is right for us to take the bold action of making our client free - and we are going even further by committing to post the source code for free for Communicator 5.0," said Jim Barksdale, Netscape's president and chief executive officer. "By giving away the source code for future versions, we can ignite the creative energies of the entire Net community and fuel unprecedented levels of innovation in the browser market. Our customers can benefit from world-class technology advancements; the development community gains access to a whole new market opportunity; and Netscape's core businesses benefit from the proliferation of the market-leading client software."


In practical terms, Netscape was on its way to corporate oblivion. One has to wonder if Netscape would be a dominant company today if it had adopted an open source business model like JBoss. They could have open sourced everything and sold support and services. That's also a similar model to the one used by Red Hat.



If you look around at the Netscape enterprise software stack, ultimately all their software is or will be open source. Look at the Java Enterprise System which Sun has announced they plan to open source. Much of that product suite came from Netscape. Red Hat's Fedora Directory server comprises one of the last Netscape products. That should open some eyes.

Revenge is a dish best served cold



Four years passed between the 1998 Netscape announcement and the delivery of Mozilla 1.0. The process took longer than expected for many reasons. The Netscape/AOL merger and the decision to create an entirely new HTML rendering engine- NGLayout (Gecko)- held up the process. None of the players involved knew much about open source development practices so that created a learning curve.



In mid-1994, Silicon Graphics founder Jim Clark and Marc Andreessen founded Mosaic Communications. By the end of the year, many of the original developers from the NCSA Mosaic project worked for Clark and Andreessen. They release their first browser to the public in late 1994.



By the summer of 1995, if you browsed the Internet, then an 80 percent chance existed you used a Netscape browser. When approached by Microsoft to purchase them, Netscape refused and Microsoft went on the war path. Three years passed and by the time Microsoft released Internet Explorer 4.0, the predatory Redmond monopoly had all but turned Netscape into a memory.



Microsoft won the browser war and like a good monopolist, they stopped developing their browser with no competition in site. Without a competitor why work? They just started munching down on their customers.



The players differ this time. Firefox may be the cavalry, but Linux has the foot soldiers and Microsoft is outnumbered. Even Redmond's money and political power can't stop an idea who's time has come. Most countries outside the US want "out" where it comes to Microsoft.



When will this end?



Eventually, George Bush will leave office and so will his administration. He's disappointed the Republican party and damaged those tight fisted Senators and Congressmen that helped create the great economy of the 1990's. So, new people will show up in the political arena and we'll see a changing of the guard.



Without a monopoly, Microsoft doesn't even rank as an average software company. So, expect to see their reign begin to end over the next three years. Meanwhile, Firefox has started settling some old scores. Microsoft doesn't have the element of surprise with them this time around.



The open source community has entrenched itself. Real competition exists for Microsoft this cycle. Microsoft is not fighting a little OS/2 group of desktop developers over at IBM, they must contend with many companies, a huge development community and a public learning about alternatives.



Mozilla has done a wonderful job of making a comeback. The days of seeing web pages like the one I encountered yesterday, will soon be gone. When I called to protest, the technical support person told me how to change the preferences in my Firefox browser. He also invited me to speak at his LUG meeting.



I'm already seeing changes. The browser makes a difference. Thank you, Jim Barksdale for the decision you made to open source your browser. The dream still lives and payback's a lady!




Perhaps the days of this will come to an end soon.



  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: LXer Features; Groups: Mozilla

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (11)

Has the code survived?

Is there any original Netscape code left in Mozilla/Firefox?

I think Mozilla/FIrefox are pretty much clean-sheet-of-paper projects, what with gecko and xul and bears, oh my!!!

Maybe better to say the essential soul and spirit survived.
Read Joel On Software The rewrite of the Netscape code was a HUGE mistake. They lost 3 years and they lost the market to MS.

For all the problems with OO.o they didn't do that mistake. OO.o is still not perfect but getting better

Here is link to Joel's article http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html
bstadil --

Ummm... I don't think you heard me defend the re-write. I am on record multiple places and multiple times calling the decision a tragic mistake. IE did not have 90% of the browser market when the Netscape code was Open-Sourced.

The new code base seems to be ok -- although Apple decided against using it for Safari -- and Firefox is doing pretty well now -- but three years is a lot of time to lose. For all its incredible growth, Firefox has yet to achieve the numbers Netscape had at the time the code was handed over.

Political Diatribe

I'm not sure why the author of this article reflects on the success of Netscape and then makes a sharp turn directed at President Bush. Having a bad week, are we?

This holiday season be grateful that Netscape didn't to sell out to Microsoft. Be glad that they were the first well-known company to embrace open source software. Believe it or not the U.S. economy is on the up and up and that software monopolies are growing more and more tentative by the day.

Although it's neither here nor there, I did enjoy your speculation "if Netscape would be a dominant company today if it had adopted an open source business model like JBoss."

Like my Father says,

"The only thing money can't buy you is, poverty."

The lust for power cut across all political and philosophical divides.
So, what I read from this is that the US are a one-party dictatorship with feodal leanings that hides itself behind a phony two-party republic pretending to be a democracy to keep the people in check and make them believe they have a choice in their representation. Nice!

Things are bad in Europe too, but at least there are still a few places with truly working multiple-party democracies. There are subversions happening, but at least there are still politicians out there that listen to the people and have an influence. Look at Rocard (who would have thought the man I used to distrust would end up so well ;) ). And that's just one example...
Dino,

I think you missed the whole point Fernando is trying to make. Often, it seems like you try to murky the issue. You are an intelligent guy, whether you do that intentionally or not I am not sure.

I believe what Fernando is saying is that, you don't have to be politically motivated to criticize what you see as wrong, but we criticize it just because it is wrong. Plain and simple.

I am not a Democrat or Republican . But I too am conservative. I voted for Bush the first term because I believed him when he said he was truly "Compassionate". I was wrong. We were deceived and cheated. He plainly lied to us about many things and still continues to. I don't care whether the Democrats do the same or not, we do criticize them just the same when we think they do wrong too. Bush and his gang are in power, that is where we concentrate our opinions about and at this point.

I prefer the "In your face" approach. It seems to be more shocking and effective.

I still don't see what specifically you disagree with Fernando about? Is it the links that expose the ties and dirty tactics between the different parties which one of them happens to be in control of the Government? Or is it Fernando being a Republican but disagreeing with his x-party.
Dino,

I agree, it doesn't seem like we will have good statesmen any time soon. What is worse is, that the people seem to have no idea who to bring into the government. I see no hope from government or policticians. It is a bad situation at very bad times.
Abe -

Amen.

I think that's why I've been so angry with Democrats of late. Not that the Republicans are doing great things: they are more or less being Republicans.

Thing is -- they are vulnerable if anybody would really consider speaking to our better angels and pursuing principled stands on --- well, anything.

Shoot -- They'll lose a lot of battles. The Republicans control the government. But, people understand that. There's such a thing as saying, "Way to go, too bad the other side has all the chips."

That stuff pays off at election time (oh -- that and actually doing a few of those principled things you talk about), even if it loses in-between.

But no. It's like the Dems don't care about winning any more, or, worse, don't care about the voters enough to find out what they care about.















This thread has been moderated for being off topic and flame bait.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post