Advanced

European Union slams Microsoft, Yahoo and Google

Posted by henke54 on · 2 comments
wallstrom/Weblog; By Nick Farrell
Mail this story
Print this story

EC VICE president Margot Wallstroem has accused Microsoft, Yahoo and Google of having flexible morals when it comes to dealing with China. http://weblog.jrc.cec.eu.int/comments/wallstrom/Weblog/corpo...

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about:

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (2)

Link goes to The Inquirer

And the article in the Inquirer is very much a stub only. Additionally, they paint the emotions a wee bit wrongly. The original blog post doesn't look that intense to me. I'd suggest linking to the blog post directly the next time.

Finally, some one has spoken the truth, wait from the EU?

As usual I did not read the article, the summary was enough for me:

The buck is more powerful than freedom (or is it the Yaun? - they are financing out budget deficit) business is business (or alternative wording business is politics and all power resides in said combination).

I thought the EU, just had a mini fit when they wanted to sell weapons to the mainland, mere details like shooting their own rural inhabitants, poisoning the drinking water and the air was not enough to stop them. Oh, what was it - oops those damn nukes in N. Korea. Well let's hope that was temporary, you know there is good business in weapons.

Is the future is so vaunted in China that everyone is dying to put down their bets on the next world driving economy? I, however, with my little mind cannot understand the rush to produce trite items at higher energy input thousands of miles distant from their supposed target selling locations when more resources and investment must be expended to bring it to market. That is, unless this is just a temporary measure where when George Bush (the dumber) leaves the throne bills come due and the U.S. slides irreversibly into to third world status.

I would warn those betting on the sure supremacy of the New China, with the rampant corruption (as our true friend Karl has written: the historical imperative of ruling class contradictions leads to ... [well he couldn't get everything right]) has lead to extreme and bloody over throwing of brutal, corrupt regimes. However, the mayhem that followed has in the past been so destructive that the populous seems to value societal stability too highly, thus, allowing a new repressive regime to arise upon the ashes of the former only to repeat the mistakes once again.

Perhaps all that inward rush of capital and countries are secretly aimed at bringing the increasing threatened political structure down, however, I doubt that is their real intent though unintentionally they may do their part to hasten the inevitable.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post