Advanced

Linux on Mac Could Spike Attackers' Interest

Posted by dcparris on · 3 comments
MacNewsWorld; By Erika Morphy
Mail this story
Print this story

Running Linux does not render the user immune to virus or malware infiltration. "If you are running Linux as the primary OS and are using the Internet, you are still open to security-based holes that Unix systems have," Mike Romo, Symantec product manager for the Macintosh, told

[In light of this article, how worried should we be? Not that one should ignore sound security practices, of course. - dcparris]

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Linux

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (3)

Same old story

Hi,

yes we've heard and read this over and over again. But as a matter of fact I've never experienced a single worm, virus or similar since 1997. Of cause my box is regularly connected, if I would take Symantecs statements regarding Linux security for granted I should be worried all the time! Call me a comfortable numb or whatever you like. If you mind some basic rules while setting up your box or network there shouldn't be too much troublesome situations arise. Well, I don't say that there isn't any security problem running Linux, but I think most of Symantecs statements should be regarded as lobbying tightly bound to their own business interests.

Thomas

Fun quotes

"So if you are running Linux you want to run Linux AV (antivirus) software.". To defend against all those non-existant Linux viruses in the wild, of course.

"If you are running Linux as the primary OS and are using the Internet, you are still open to security-based holes that Unix systems have.". Huh? So my Linux box is going to get hacked via a bug in Solaris, and my UNIX-based OS/X box is immune?

"The operating system is disappearing as far as the computer experience is concerned. Now, the computer experience is all about what you do online and how careful you are.". Uhh, wait, you just singled out UNIX in the previous quote.

FUD, FUD, FUD.

The article implies MacOS is more secure than Linux, without giving any arguments. They're both UNIX-like OSes, and equally likely to have "UNIX vulnerabilities" whatever those may be. There is an implication of Linux being more vulnerable because it is more popular, but we all know security by obscurity doesn't work. Actually MacOS with its large proprietary parts is likely to be less secure.

Symantec wants us to buy scanners for a few viruses that won't infect us anyway. If they don't work as root, have a simple firewall (anyone can use firestarter), and don't run programs that they found in random places on the net or in their email, desktop users are more than safe. And what is the typical place for a mac? Yup, a desktop.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post