Advanced

New Year 2007 - The year of GNU/Linux

Posted by dsTst on · 7 comments
linuxhelp.blogspot.com; By Ravi
Mail this story
Print this story

This is the dawn of a new year. As usual, the new year is ushered in by making resolutions and wishes. And what is a Linux enthusiast to wish for if not for this year being the year of GNU/Linux. This article ponders on the accomplishments of GNU/Linux and Free software in the year gone by and feels that after all, 2007 could really be the year of GNU/Linux.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Linux

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (7)

And so it begins again, 2007 the year that Linux 'makes it'. As it was in 2004, and 2005, and 2006... This crap is starting to become a real sore point for me. All of the aforementioned years were important in the advancement of Linux. 2007 will undoubtedly be another one.

I have no doubt that Linux will eventually be the major Desktop. The disputes with proprietary drivers, and codex, and GPLv3 are all transitory. They and other detailing will eventually be resolved. None of this will stop the success of Linux.

Part of success of Linux is going to be that MS is becoming so insecure, distrustful of its customers, and, downright distasteful that Linux becomes the logical default. Most of the reason that Linux will be successful is because it is a superb OS with a wonderful choice of desktops and servers, because it has a great community of developers and users, and, because it belongs to 'us'.

Will this wonderful success happen in 2007? The real question is whether it's important that it happen right now. The answer is that it's definitely not. I suspect that at some point we'll be able to look back and be able to say 'it happened about then', but I doubt that we'll realize the moment when it actually occurs.
It does get old to hear it each year...old and nauseating.
did you guys read the article? It's pretty good. He doesn't make the usual dim claims of "this is the year we reeaaalllly make it! No really!" It's a nice overview of some of the things he likes about Linux and FOSS.
> article?

Well, not much of an article., but yes, I read it.
I witnessed the year of Linux in 2006. In terms of user-friendliness, power, etc., it became a legitimate alternative for nearly all existing users. (Ubuntu, opensuse, pclinux, heck, even to some extent Debian).

You're going to give yourself ulcers if you define the year of Linux as the year in which someone else makes the choice to actually use Linux. But it's there if, like me, they conclude they aren't smart enough to handle viruses and malware.
I first got Linux installed on a 75Mhz 486 w/ 8 MB ram in February of 1997. I'd been working on it since December of 1997. :)

But for me, 1999 was the 'Year of the Penguin' The year I switched to Linux as my main OS.

Thinking about that made me realize how far these kind of articles miss the mark. Each year is 'The Year' for Linux for thousands, and maybe millions of new users.

It might not be the year for one pundit, or for a few analysts. But on January 1st 2008 more people will use Linux day in and day out than do today. For each one of those people, 2007 will be the year Linux 'Made It'. Even if the press doesn't think so.

So in the way the predictions of Linux domination meant it, the predictions have always failed to be correct. But for numerous users each year, the prediction was absolutely true. What ever year it was that they switched to Linux was the year that Linux 'Made It'.

I think that the second half of 2007 and the first half of 2008 is going to be a great time to get Linux on the old XP boxes people will be forgetting about as they buy their new Vista capable boxes. After a few weeks or months, the viruses and worms will slow their Vista boxes, and they'll be looking for solutions.

I'll be ready with CD's.
helois has just posted one of his best http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/77497/index.html which pertains to all this. I agree with most, if not all of it. If nothing else, it's a great read :).

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post