Advanced

Canonical explain the new Ubuntu census package

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 12 comments
Heise
Mail this story
Print this story

Canonical developer Rick Spencer has blogged about the recent discovery of a canonical-census package in the Ubuntu repositories. Although initial speculation suggested Canonical was tracking the users of pre-installed systems with Ubuntu, Spencer points out that the idea of the census package is actually to count the number of OEM installed Ubuntu system without identifying the users of those systems.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Ubuntu; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (12)

I have thought for a long time that somthing like this is a good idea. We really do need a better idea of how many Linux powered machines there are out there. This will gives us some idea, at least, of how many Ubuntu powered machines, from this particular system builder, that are still running Ubuntu. What it won't tell us, though,is whether those machines were re purposed as other Linux machines.
> I have thought for a long time that somthing like this is a good idea.

As long as it's voluntary, yes. It shouldn't be installed by default though. The user should be asked first.
I believe it can be uninstalled with a simple apt-get remove, or by unchecking it in synaptic.. But it will be installed, at least on this OEM's computers, by default.
> ...But it will be installed, at least on this OEM's computers, by default.

As the OEM, you're acting as the agent for the user (admittedly in advance), so that's OK. And since it's undoubtedly a package, I'm sure it can be easily removed.
ah, so the regenerating flash cookies are OK too now that people know about them?
You are on the Internet..you are being watched, informed, tracked, entertained, cataloged..shall I continue? ;-)
It's the mark of the Beast!

Oh, wait, this is the Internet...

It's the mark of the Breast!
So is the mark of the beast "http" or is it "@", as no one, it seems, can communicate without the "@".
> ...so the regenerating flash cookies are OK too now that people know about them?

Did they ask first? I'm pretty sure the answer to that is no. And most people still don't know about them.
Quoting:You are on the Internet..you are being watched, informed, tracked, entertained, cataloged..shall I continue? ;-)


Giving users the anonymity they want and need is something I hope happens more and more in the near future, and I really think that Linux and BSD should lead the way in providing easier and more complete ways for users to retain their privacy.
I hope your right Steve, but I don't see my words being untrue for a long time..:-(
As time goes by Scott I see them more true than now, and now is scary enough.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post