5 ways to have a more inclusive event
|
|
|
Comments (4)
Males are not systematically excluded from tech education. Women are.
>Males are not systematically excluded from tech education. Women are.
I refute this statement.
There are thousands of programs out there for college and high school women and girls to participate in advanced engineering and mathematics programs.
Here's a small sampling:
MIT.
http://wtp.mit.edu/
Caltech.
http://diversitycenter.caltech.edu/women/caltech
U of Texas.
http://www.utexas.edu/community-engagement/youth-outreach-education
In fact, practically everywhere you look there are giant signs pasted all over every educational institution for women to be exclusively included in tech education. Having said that, I see no problem with any program that seeks to further the education of any person. I simply refute the meme that women are currently being systematically excluded from becoming educated in any particular area.
Did I mention that I have a high school age son? And that he's enrolled in technology specialized high school? And that his engineering centered school is greater than 50% female?
If there was a prior problem of systematic exclusion of women in tech education, that problem has been solved. You could argue a particular case or a particular situation of excluding women, but systematic exclusion? No. That statement seems to be unsupported by the current educational reality.
I refute this statement.
There are thousands of programs out there for college and high school women and girls to participate in advanced engineering and mathematics programs.
Here's a small sampling:
MIT.
http://wtp.mit.edu/
Caltech.
http://diversitycenter.caltech.edu/women/caltech
U of Texas.
http://www.utexas.edu/community-engagement/youth-outreach-education
In fact, practically everywhere you look there are giant signs pasted all over every educational institution for women to be exclusively included in tech education. Having said that, I see no problem with any program that seeks to further the education of any person. I simply refute the meme that women are currently being systematically excluded from becoming educated in any particular area.
Did I mention that I have a high school age son? And that he's enrolled in technology specialized high school? And that his engineering centered school is greater than 50% female?
If there was a prior problem of systematic exclusion of women in tech education, that problem has been solved. You could argue a particular case or a particular situation of excluding women, but systematic exclusion? No. That statement seems to be unsupported by the current educational reality.
> Males are not systematically excluded from tech education. Women are.
Seriously? You actually think they are being excluded?
Seriously? You actually think they are being excluded?
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

My immediate understanding is : a male knocks at the door of this organization for technical education and is told : 'You're not a female, our tech education is not for you. '.
If, and only if I'm wrong, how would it be welcome the other way round : a female knocks at the door of a tech education organization and is told : 'You're not a male, our tech education is not for you' !
I definitely want to have missed something in this post !