Advanced

OpenOffice.org 2.0.4 - Don't Blink

Posted by dcparris on · 25 comments
LXer Newswire; By D.C. Parris
Mail this story
Print this story

LXer Feature: 06-Oct-2006

On the word of an LXer reader, I downloaded OpenOffice.org 2.0.4 Release Candidate 3 to test it's load speed. I also tested copying data from Calc to Base, something that had caused repeated crashing under 2.0.3. Here's what happened.

Hot Tip From a Reader

The biggest complaint I, and I think most people, hear is that OpenOffice.org is just plain slow. I would never expect OpenOffice.org - or any office suite, for that matter - to load as fast as Microsoft Office on Windows. And even though I have never been worried about an app taking 30 seconds to load, lots of people seem to gripe if the app doesn't show up almost before they click the icon that launches it. I was recently informed that I should give 2.0.4RC3 a spin to try out its load speed. So I did.



An LXer reader who upgraded OpenOffice.org on his Debian GNU/Linux box reported that it was now as fast as any application on his system. At the time, I was using a Windows box I have access to, and grabbed OpenOffice.org's current release candidate. I ran the installation routine and launched the app. As always, the initial load time runs longer than subsequent loads, as you have to initialize templates and so on. Still, it was lightning fast.



Just How Fast?

By default, the installer sets up OpenOffice.org to run the Quickstarter when you boot into Windows. That slows down the Windows load time somewhat, but speeds up OpenOffice.org noticeably. I generally get by without the preloader, since I prefer seeing Windows go on and load up. Again, I can't type fast enough for 30 seconds to make a difference, so I've never cared whether OpenOffice.org loaded instantaneously or not. Well, it really doesn't matter all that much now.



Enough blathering, Don. Just tell us how fast it loads already! Well, all I can say is, don't blink. That's right. If you're of the opinion that OpenOffice.org is slow-as-molasses bloatware, let me just say it's about the fastest molasses I've ever seen. Point. Click. Boom! Even without the preloader, it's still pretty darned fast. It seems to load in less than 2 seconds on a WinXP box with a 3Ghz Pentium chip and 512MB RAM.



If OpenOffice.org is any slower than Microsoft Office, it's only by half a blip. In fact, I loaded both at once, first clicking on MS Word, then on OOWriter, in my task tray. OOWriter came up first. Trying it the other way, Word still loses out to Writer. I suspect your mileage will vary some, but OpenOffice.org is still quick as a whip.



Bug Eliminated

With the current version of OpenOffice.org (2.0.3), I have experienced some pretty annoying crashes, mainly when going between Calc and Base. Indeed, one of the members of the OpenOffice.org DBA mailing list reported seeing my crash reports, and that they helped solve at least one or two bugs almost immediately. So I attempted the copy and paste routine that caused the big hassle before, and it worked.



I had suspected there was a problem with my attempt to paste over 600 rows of Calc data into a new table in Base. After reducing the number of rows selected by an order of magnitude, I found I was still experiencing issues. Also, it didn't matter whether I was using Ubuntu or Windows XP, it just crashed. Whatever the problem, the OpenOffice.org team seems to have corrected it in the 2.0.4 release.



Between the speed boost and eliminating a serious hassle, it looks like the OpenOffice.org folks have really put some effort into grinding away at the stranglehold their biggest competitor seems to have. I'm sure they have resolved a number of other issues, but I haven't experienced too many problems with OpenOffice.org myself. What I do know is that, by the time you finish loading MS Word, which only runs on two operating systems, I'll already be done with my first paragraph - and I type slow.



Footnotes, Links, etc.

Thanks to LXer regular, jimf, for the tip!

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: LXer Features, Reviews; Groups: OpenOffice.org

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (25)

That is great to hear.

One of my pet grouse with Open Office (OOWrite) was its slow initial loading time. Especially compared to the native applications such as Abiword or the windows counterpart MSWord. I thought it was because atleast a part of it was coded using java language. Or maybe because of the time it takes to load a lot of plugins in memory.

It is nice to know that they have eventually got around to tidy up the code to make it as quick as any other native application. I look forward to using the latest version of OpenOffice.org.
Excellent news indeed. OOo rulez!
The only OOo component that uses java is Base.

I would have like to hear how the office suite loaded on *Linux*, this site being called lxer.com. Did I miss that part somewhere?
Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but Debian GNU/Linux is Linux, plus the GNU utilities, so I guess that should have answered your question.
You're getting confused nalf38. Neither I nor Don use 'that other' OS :D
I do use it on my full-time job - not my choice, but oh well. The nice thing in this case is that it gave me the opportunity to test OOo against MS Office. I never expected OOo to actually beat MS Office loading. What a hoot!
Was just speaking of that for our personal useage Don. To be honest, I also have a reference system running for customer support, and access to MS Office. A necessary evil for the moment I guess.
Cross-platform support is going to be a necessary evil forever and ever. Any network or sysadmins who insist on specializing in a single operating system are not going to be equipped to make good decisions, or even to be very useful. It sucks rocks to have to stay Windows-literate, but that's the way it is. Anyway we need more smart, well-educated IT persons doing windows, instead of more brain-dump MCSEs. I think the single worst thing to come out of Redmond is the notion that barely-trained monkeys can be network and system administrators.

Eeee! Eeee! Ooh! Ooh! Ahhh! Ahhh! Sorry, just felt like monkeying around.
I knew your LXer photo had extensive air-brushing, I knew it!

> Anyway we need more smart, well-educated IT persons doing windows

tuxchick,

I've developed a theory on this :D

Since companies are most all $$$ oriented, I've seen most of them, skimp on the support end of it after paying all those nice MS license fees. In the smaller outfits I've worked with, they're lucky if they have a MCSE. It usually gets passed off to Engineering. I suspect that the lower cost of Linux software and hardware lets them at least think about properly trained IT personnel.
> I knew your LXer photo had extensive air-brushing, I knew it!

You might enjoy my family photo album: http://images.google.com/images?q=orangutan&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-...

:-D
>> my family photo album:

Hmm Nice looking family!! Uhh Uhhhhhhhh Uhgg!! (Orangutan - speak for "who da babe??") ;-)
Oh Don... which one is your wife? Or should I just ask her?
> Oh Don... which one is your wife? Or should I just ask her?

She's the cute one! :-p I actually love orangutans. They might be mad at me if they knew I compared them to MCSEs though.
That's unfair, they are far smarter than MCSEs.

Bilingual text editing

Perhaps it is me, perhaps it is OO, but I work in Quebec Canada, where documents are released in the two languages (French and English). Paragraphs are usually alternating with the two languages. The awkwardness to switch languages between french and english is driving me nuts.

So, perhaps second language support could be better implemented.
Tell your Government to grow up and use one language for everything. Yeah, I know that won't sit too well with the Frenchies but that's their problem.
Isatenstein: I've never attempted to write in dual languages, so I can't really address that. I would suggest working closely with the OOo folks to address that issue.

1c3d0g: You know that's not a solution - at least not a realistic one. Besides, you may have just insulted one of the "Frenchies". Gee, wouldn't you feel sorta silly in that case. Besides, I'm in North Carolina, and it seems like almost everything is in English/Spanish around here these days.
> everything is in English/Spanish

Soon to be Spanish/Spanish to suite our new masters.
And what about European Union? Eleven official languages is just a bit more than two :)
>Soon to be Spanish/Spanish to suite our new masters.<

Aww poor little Jim..

Wouldn't you rather be mastered by Mexicans than French? All the Mexicans want is a better life for them and their family. Plus they are willing to work all the jobs you and I would never take anyway.

Just about every Mexican I have ever worked with or had working for me was a decent human being, I cannot say that for the French I have met but I do not judge the whole on meeting only a part.
> Plus they are willing to work all the jobs you and I would never take anyway.

Oh, I'm perfectly willing to do those jobs. Just not at the salary they're willing to pay.
> Just about every Mexican I have ever worked with or had working for me was a decent human being

Absolutely, but the ones I worked along side of were US Citizens, and are just as against the illegal 'invasion' as I am.
I have worked with both, which really doesn't matter anyway.

I wonder how the Assyrians, Gauls, Germanic Tribes, Britons, Incas, Aztecs and a thousand other cultures felt about it too.

It has been happening forever and it will continue forever as well.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post