Rant Mode Equals One: Let's Re-License Redmond
A recent post by Ed Bott highlights once again another aspect of freedom that is granted to users of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). The freedom is to use the software on as many machines as you wish, without restriction. In this case, Microsoft has added yet another new "feature" -- the product is only transferable one time. That means you get to move it once -- after that, it's time to purchase the software you already own, yet again. It's almost comical to me just how many things related to intellectual property Microsoft has tightened over the years -- they make it so you don't even "own" the product you "purchased" in enterprise situation -- they want you to rent it instead. Over the years they've gotten even more restrictive -- for example, Windows XP users have had to come to terms with the fact that if too many aspects of their system change, may have to re-license the product they already have purchased and installed. It's crazy stuff. Those of you who rarely have to deal with these limitations are likely thinking to yourself thoughts like "what the heck is he talking about?". Those Windows users that have been tuned to this channel might be saying something like "I don't see what all the big fuss is about."
It's really simple -- you give up your freedom when the "vendor" in question forces you to click through
an End User License Agreement (EULA). EULAs typically limit your freedom. Some EULAs in the past have
even prevented you from discussing how well the product performed with members of the press. Talk about
audacious -- Microsoft is supposedly selling their products in a Free market, and will complain often
about being able to freely compete (usually when they've been nailed by the Department of Justice).
But do they have your rights in mind while they're doing all this lobbying?
Lemme answer that one -- No, your Freedom is going to be in the ability to shell out cash. Here's a thought; You're free -- especially with the roll-out of something inane like Vista -- to go somewhere else, and that's exactly where I'm going to point you. If you're one of these people, please ask yourself -- Isn't it time you gave up the yoke of EULA limitations? Wouldn't it be nice to add hardware with impunity, switch hardware with impunity, install with impunity? With FOSS products, it's a snap -- you simply have to learn a different OS. While this may sound like an uncomfortable experience -- I gotta ask: Aren't you going to have to do that anyway when Vista rolls into town? Lord knows when that is, but I've heard it might be last year, or this year, or ... maybe next year. I can hardly wait. Rather, I gave up waiting in 1994. You don't have to wait either, is the point I'm trying to make. Why not take that time and learn Linux instead? There are many Linux distributions to choose from. (Just in case you're in the mood, some are listed at the end of this article.) Most of these are totally free, down-loadable off the Internet, easily (and legally) burned to as many CDs as you wish -- and best of all -- easily installed over crappy old Windows XP. Heck, you may want to do this anyway if you've been spending any time recently re-installing to fix virus or other malware-related problems. If you have to reinstall the OS, it's probably a good time to try something new on the ole' PC anyway. Yeah, that's right, you can even use your old hardware -- most of the time it'll scream under Linux, by the way -- and then you too can experience true Freedom. Speaking of which, let me take this moment to share some of my past 11 plus years of experience using Linux as a desktop solution for myself and my family. I know this may come as a stretch, but trust me, it's all true -- my personal experience. I've never, on my computer at home, running Linux,
At the end of the day though, It's a really nice feeling knowing
that the people that created your software had your rights in mind. References: Ed Bott's Post on ZDNET: Microsoft and Corporate Software Rental:
Microsoft Windows XP and hardware changes:
Easy to Use and Install Free Linux Distributions: Disclaimer: Linux distributions are packaged versions of Linux, ready to use -- they're created by groups of people or corporations that believe in software freedom. There are a lot more distributions of Linux than this small list. In fact, someone's likely to mention their favorite distribution for new users in the talkbacks on this article. This simple disclaimer is my way of wimping out and keeping my article less than 20 pages in length... Paul (FeriCyde) Ferris is a Linux professional and community member. He has been using Unix and Linux for a combined total of over 17 years. His articles have graced LXer.com, Linux Journal, LinuxToday, LinuxPlanet, NewsForge and various other Linux news and technical information sites. His recent expertise with enterprise-class implementations of Linux have lead to the creation of the the batchlogin project, his first large-scale Free Software project. A husband, father and more, yet his technical passion is Linux and has remained so for the past 13 years. |
|
|
Comments (44)
Paul - You sadistic b*st*rd!!
I see the picture is fixed.
Hmmm. Pauli's not the only sadistic b*st*rd in these parts!!!!
Quoting: I do rather wonder how you manage to handle english so well. Did you write a program for that?
Dino, As usual, all I'm trying to do is communicate, and darned if one of the first talkbacks I come across insults the very core of my being. Of course I didn't write a program for my english, or it would make more sense.
It's sad that all some people can do to make their day rosy is log into LXer and flame someone. You need to take a page from the book of FeriCyde and become a more peaceful being, like me.
You warmongering hackers are all alike.
You crouch in the dust of your fox-holes (should I say "firefox holes"), nothing but the glow of recently exploded shrapnel and the smell of cordite to guide your way. You thought you'd just waltz in here, and take advantage of my pacifist nature -- that I'd just roll over (as usual) and not fight back?
Well guess what?, I'm on to you and your testosterone-laden ways. I can see right through your subtle attempts to appear peaceful all the while firing up that flamethrower of flatulent verbage. But it won't be so easy in the future. I have my eye on you now -- soon (SOON!) everyone on LXer.com will know you for the kind of madman you are. Tuck those nuclear missiles away -- we have anti-missile missiles at the ready.
Hmmm. For some reason I feel a lot better now.
Maybe there's something cathartic about all this flaming after all...
-=FeriCyde=-
Sadly, I have no nukes available for this fray.
Seems my supplier's recent quality control test went badly and their ability to deliver is now in serious question.
I am left with conventional weapons and unconventional wisdom.
I am happy to have provided you a moment of catharsis.
But, to your original point, I can be easy-going.
My computers run Linux and I don't wilt under a steady stream of viri or constantly fight a vendor who is trying to take my software away.
At least, not directly.
And I say this as just another unbiased individual out in cyberspace who has never even met Paul and therefore has no reason whatsoever to say that even Hunter S. Thompson should worship at his feet.
Sincerely and unbiasedly,
George Tirebiter
Good to see you still kicking around.
Way back when, people said a lot of things about you that didn't seem very nice at the time, but...
things aren't always what they seem.
I've never been one to belittle male intuition, unless, of course, it be little.
I will yield to your Paulness and accept that good ol' GT (if those are his real initials) is sarcasticizing.
That is, if Paul is YOUR real name...
Exellent! Excellent! Excellent! article.
yes it is very boring - I am in IT and I have to simulate breakage and reinstall stuff just to keep my skills sharp. This stuff just does not break and I never have to fiddle with it. (Of course besides changing the look and feel - eyecandy).
It just amazes me what folks put up with and accept it "as the cost of doing business." Meanwhile jobs are lost and folks go unemployed and outsourced but we still manage to find enough money to upgrade a piece of crap os that just needs more money to keep it running. When will the insanity stop.
I also love the look on someone's face when I tell them I have never had a virus on my linux system. Some people have tried but never succeeded.
Hey, Windows gives you two freedoms!
8 earlier comments in the full thread.
More like 'to be instructed by'. Talking implies a two way exchange of information, and, they obviously will not listen to anything you tell them.
Not to use MS junk to start with.
That's our guys in Redmond, innovating away whilst the rest of the FOSS community plays ketchup ;)
I'm gonna play mustard now... No, wait, Pickles!
--FeriCyde
Reminds me of the guy in that movie with the toothpicks between his eye-lids, tied up in a chair, forced to watch a movie.
Oh, nono, not forced, 'given the freedom to' (be forced?).
It does have that effect, doesn't it.
It looks like that's the way the content industry is heading.
My father bought a HD-recorder (with a harddisk) a year ago. When there 'soccer-summaries' are on TV, he starts recording, and after half an hour, he starts watching, while still recording. Thereby, you can 'chase' the recording, and by fast forwarding the commercials and BS-soccercomments, you can skip half an hour; thereby watching an hour of soccer in half an hour, and you are ready when the tv-programme is over. I believe it's possible with TiVo also.
Because people don't watch commercials this way anymore, the content industry started thinking about ways of making this behaviour impossible: commercials can't be fast forwarded anymore. I always thought: What's next? Forbidding people to go to the toilet during commercials? Tying them to the chair? That's when I thought of "A Clockwork Orange", a movie I can't seem to forget neither.
Don't forget the irritating trend of inserting ads in the programs, across the bottom quarter of the screen.
Quoting:Don't forget the irritating trend of inserting ads in the programs, across the bottom quarter of the screen.
Is that bad in the USA already? I believe we saw a first example of this on Dutch TV. Anyway, resistance is futile, after the PC our TV's will be turned into commercial-columns. In the future, they might directly project them on our retina as well.
Oh, Paulie (and everyone else); Sorry for bringing up the Clockwork. Didn't mean to ruïn your day.
"It's evolution, baby!"
Soap ads, I can't wait...
/me ducks to dodge the flying fruit
Quoting:There was? What show?
Some Tia Maria adds in Stars (Iceseasels?) dancing on ice (sbs6). Also frequently I see commercials for other, upcoming shows. Let's hope we won't see it anymore. Thousands of people sending sms'es for € 0,60 each also, BTW. Any area in our (western societies) neighbourhood without ads? Not in my area!
There are advantages to owning the surrounding 45 acres. :)
PCLinuxOS
I'm a Microsoft products tech (CompTIA ID COMP10649241, latest qual), now on disability. I started getting into Linux about 2002, when User-scrambled XP PCs were driving us wacky at the shop where I was then working. I didn't go at all well, at first, with Mandrake 9.x, gave up for awhile, tried again with 10.x, then Mandriva 2005 and 2006.
Sadly, as 'full solutions' for my PC-ing, they were just too 'finicky-awkward' to feel comfy with... Enter PCLinuxOS. Freeby download ISO, burns to LiveCD, to try out, and also intstalls, starting at the LiveCD desktop, from it. They have a 'deal' (show a splash-screen on boot) with Nvidia for drivers. Just put in dvdcss2 with the superb Synaptic, and throw your movie DVDs in the drive - plays instantly with Kaffeine.
In fact - it all 'just works'. It's designed as a 'beginner from Windows' Linux - but is all-Linux, not a Windows clone, like some. It isn't a 'lump of an install', like Suse or Mandriva - so suits older PCs, but with more than 5000 items in the Synaptic-accessed Repository, can be loaded up with excellent apps, tools, utilities, as much as you like.
Not one glitch with any, in the 6 months I've had versions 0.92 and 0.93a. So I think it deserves a mention in your Easy to Use Distros - without displacing any of the worthy others. I have no connections with the Team at PCLinuxOS, other than as a very delighted User. Do love LXer, too.
Best Regards, David. (davdoak@yahoo.com.au)
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Now...as to the rest...
You heartless, insensitive, altogether wicked monster!!!
Flaunting your freedom from the hassles most people take for granted.
Not me, mind you. I haven't been on a Linux desktop quite as long as you, but I'm going on 9 years. My experience isn't quite as rosy. I had some, um, entertaining experiences during the 2.4 kernel's VM "experience". I guess you wouldn't call those crashes so much as slowdowns so bad that I got tired of waiting and punched the big red button. Still, close to the same effect. All in the past now, though.
It is wild, though, to hear people talk about viruses, updates to their scanners, etc. I sure would hate to live that way. I sure would hate to discover that I have upgraded some piece of something that made my software demand a phone home for blessing.
Linux does the things I need and more. Hooray!
My wife's not so lucky. Oh well. You can't win them all.
Oh -- Paulie -- The more I think about the picture, the more I think invisible ain't a bad look for you. Makes it hard to see the circles around the eyes gone bloodshot from staring at a phosphor-burned monocrhome screen composing racy ascii images and creating object files with a hex editor while cackling "Assemblers are for weenies".
I do rather wonder how you manage to handle english so well. Did you write a program for that?