The future of Windows should be open source
|
|
|
Comments (5)
another what?
> Do we have to upgrade our hardware .a g a i n ?
LOL, speak for yourself, I run linux.
LOL, speak for yourself, I run linux.
My first thought was: "just one?" [like in "Last Action Hero" movie: "Just one gun, Jack?"]
This will never happen.
Think about it. Even if the rumors about NT including the BSD TCP/IP stack, and that NT was originally DEC's "Micah" operating system aren't true, then somebody else's code is in NT for sure. Microsoft has too much history (Stacker anyone?) of misappropriating code for NT to be squeaky-clean enough to open-source.
Also, all the Windows "favorite ones", the companies and gurus that have had access to source, would just freak out. Their Secret Advantage would disappear, and they'd have to compete on merit.
It'll never happen.
Also, all the Windows "favorite ones", the companies and gurus that have had access to source, would just freak out. Their Secret Advantage would disappear, and they'd have to compete on merit.
It'll never happen.
Well, they could go the Sun's and Java's way and release everything except the encumbered parts. Like - BSOD code, or sth... That won't be much, yeah, but still...
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Does he mean SP1 SP2 and SP3 ? or a re-write of the present failure. Do we have to upgrade our hardware .a g a i n ?