Another desperate attempt to discredit Massachusetts OpenDocument adoption
|
|
|
Comments (6)
Get this story out.
I recommend we do a command encore on this piece maybe three times this coming week. I'll dig it, and get it out to other wires, but we can't just let this run on a slow Saturday PM. At least that's my belief...this is too much to let slip by.
I agree. This isn't the last the world will hear of this story.
If only the rest of Massachusetts government...
Having lived in Massachusetts, I can relate how badly I wish all the operations of the Massachusetts government cockroaches would be as closely investigated.
"Corrupt" is an absurd understatement. I wonder who paid for this "Front Page Advertisement"?
"Corrupt" is an absurd understatement. I wonder who paid for this "Front Page Advertisement"?
Bob_Robertson: Is that a rhetorical question?
:^)
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

It was on the front page of the Boston Globe newspaper today, and the lead article on their web site--an investigation that normally would be buried in the City & Region section of the paper. So you can't miss it: IT manager Peter Quinn of the Massachusetts state government is criticized for not fully reporting trips he took during his promotion of the OpenDocument format.
This is dirty.
Digg Andy's story story. Don't let this slip through on a holiday.